AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. DARRELL CLARK, appellant.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the trial court's response to a jury note impermissibly shifted the burden of proof is unpreserved for appellate review due to his failure to object or make any request with respect to the court's eventual response (see CPL 470.05; People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., SMITH, GOLDSTEIN and LUCIANO, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. CLARK
(Oct 15, 2002)