DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, that branch of the cross motion which was for a temporary stay of proceedings against the appellant is denied as academic, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.
Evidentiary material may be considered on a motion to dismiss made pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to assess the viability of a complaint where such evidence demonstrates that a material fact alleged by the plaintiff to be true is "not a fact at all," and that "no significant dispute exists regarding it" (Guggenheimer v. Ginzburg, 43 N.Y.2d 268, 275; see Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co., 40 N.Y.2d 633, 635; Mayerhoff v. Timernides, 269 A.D.2d 369). Here, contrary to the allegations of the complaint, the undisputed evidentiary material clearly established that the appellant was not the owner, the insured, or the driver of the car in which the plaintiff was a passenger at the time of the single vehicle accident in which she was injured. Accordingly, there was no basis to impose liability for negligence upon the appellant, and the Supreme Court erred in denying the appellant's motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him and in granting a temporary stay of proceedings against him pursuant to CPLR 2201 while the plaintiff completed other nominally-related actions.
ALTMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, McGINITY, SCHMIDT and RIVERA, JJ., concur.