Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ORIENTUS WERNER, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Orientus Werner ("defendant") appeals the denial of his motion to suppress statements he made to the police. The defendant attempted to preserve his right to appeal the trial court's order. However, as both sides stipulated, the defendant does not have a right to appeal because the issue is not dispositive. See Seabrook v. State, 620 So.2d 227 (Fla.3d DCA 1993). The appeal is dismissed without prejudice to the defendant's right to withdraw the plea and for relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Sharpe v. State, 589 So.2d 964 (Fla.3d DCA 1991); Roob v. State, 572 So.2d 1022 (Fla.3d DCA 1991).

Appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WERNER v. STATE
(Oct 23, 2002)