AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER IRIZARRY, appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention regarding the trial court's failure to give an alibi charge is not preserved for appellate review since the defendant neither requested such a charge nor objected to the jury charge on that basis (see CPL 470.05; People v. Lassiter, 161 A.D.2d 669). We decline to review the issue in the exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction (see CPL 470.15[c], [6][a]), given the strong evidence of the defendant's guilt and in view of the thorough instructions provided by the trial court that the defendant's guilt had to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v. Jones, 270 A.D.2d 500, 501; People v. Babis, 202 A.D.2d 601).

The defendant's contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel is without merit. Considering the totality of the circumstances existing at the time of the representation, counsel provided the defendant with meaningful representation (see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708; People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

FLORIO, J.P., FEUERSTEIN, KRAUSMAN and CRANE, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. IRIZARRY
(Oct 28, 2002)