AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

FRANK ALONSO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The complaint was properly dismissed. The alleged hazard in this trip and fall action, temporary plywood flooring raised from the surrounding well-lit subway platform floor and painted bright yellow around the edges, was open and apparent and thus did not constitute a trap or snare for the unwary, and, under all the relevant circumstances, too trivial to be actionable (see Trincere v. County v. Suffolk, 90 N.Y.2d 976; Cruz v. Deno's Wonder Wheel Park, 297 A.D.2d 653).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ALONSO v. N.Y.C. TRANSIT AUTH
(Oct 29, 2002)