DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of manslaughter in the second degree and assault in the second degree is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v. Thomas, 266 A.D.2d 571; People v. James, 265 A.D.2d 427). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, who saw and heard the witnesses (see People v. Gaimari, 176 N.Y. 84). The determination of the trier of fact should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see People v. Garafolo, 44 A.D.2d 86). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt of manslaughter in the second degree and assault in the second degree was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15).
The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.
S. MILLER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN and RIVERA, JJ., concur.