Evidence-bare fact of prior convictions-absence of testimony by defendant-prejudicial error
The decision of the Court of Appeals affirming defendant's convictions for possession with intent to sell or deliver cocaine and trafficking in cocaine is reversed for the reason stated in the dissenting opinion that the trial court committed prejudicial error in permitting the State to introduce, through the testimony of a deputy clerk of court, the bare fact of defendant's prior convictions for cocaine offenses to show knowledge and intent when defendant did not testify.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.
REVERSED.