AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

RAYMOND PINKARD, appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, respondent.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, he was not prejudiced by the court's instructions to the jury (see Kambat v. St. Francis Hosp., 89 N.Y.2d 489, 494; Thompson v. Pizza Hut of Am., 262 A.D.2d 302, 303; Raimondi v. New York Racing Assn., 213 A.D.2d 708, 709).

A fair interpretation of the evidence supports the jury's determination that the New York City Housing Authority was not negligent (see Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are either without merit or do not require reversal.

ALTMAN, J.P., SMITH, H. MILLER and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PINKARD v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, 2001-01158 [2d Dept 2002
(Nov 4, 2002)