AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. MONTE JOHNSON, appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contentions, his plea of guilty was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary (see People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9). By pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited judicial review of the nonjurisdictional issues raised in his motion to dismiss the indictment due to alleged prosecutorial misconduct before the Grand Jury (see People v. Hansen, 95 N.Y.2d 227; People v. Williams, 291 A.D.2d 347, lv denied 98 N.Y.2d 682; People v. Davis, 289 A.D.2d 1069; People v. Gerber, 182 A.D.2d 252), "and the court was under no obligation to specifically advise [the] defendant of that consequence of his plea" (People v. Mobayed, 234 A.D.2d 48).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

RITTER, J.P., FLORIO, S. MILLER and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. JOHNSON
(Nov 4, 2002)