MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum:
Respondent mother appeals from an order of disposition that, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated her parental rights with respect to her two daughters, transferred the guardianship and custody of the children to petitioner, and freed them for adoption. Contrary to respondent's contention, Family Court's finding of permanent neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence establishing that, despite diligent efforts by petitioner to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship, respondent failed substantially and continuously or repeatedly to plan for the future of the children for a period of more than one year following their placement with petitioner, although physically and financially able to do so ( see Social Services Law § 384-b [a]; Matter of Angie M.P., 291 A.D.2d 932, lv denied 98 N.Y.2d 602; Matter of Kerensa D. [appeal No. 2] , 278 A.D.2d 878, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 707; see generally Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 142-143). Contrary to respondent's further contention, the court did not abuse its discretion in declining to enter a suspended judgment ( see Matter of Jason J., 283 A.D.2d 982; Matter of Matthew H., 274 A.D.2d 975). "The court's focus at the dispositional hearing is the best interests of the child * * * [and] [t]he court's assessment that respondent was not likely to change [her] behavior is entitled to great deference" ( Matter of Philip D., 266 A.D.2d 909, 909; see Jason J., 283 A.D.2d 982).