AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HARRY P. GINTY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

On appeal from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (Penal Law § 220.03) and other offenses, defendant contends that County Court erred in denying his motion to suppress an oral statement that was not included in the CPL 710.30 notice. We reject that contention. "[T]he notice requirement is excused when a defendant moves for suppression of such evidence" ( People v. Johnson, 280 A.D.2d 613, 614; see 710.30 [3]; People v. Laws, 286 A.D.2d 991, 992, lv denied 97 N.Y.2d 706; People v. Goss, 281 A.D.2d 298, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 863; see also People v. Brown, 281 A.D.2d 700, 701, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 826).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. GINTY
(Nov 15, 2002)