Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. LARRY PHILLIPS

Granted. See per curiam.

JTK

PFC

CDK

BJJ

JPV

CDT

JLW

PER CURIAM

Writ granted; court of appeal decision as to sentencing reversed and set aside; trial court's sentence reinstated. In State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La. 5/31/96), 674 So.2d 957, 959, cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1043 (1996), this Court emphasized that the only relevant question on review of a sentence within the statutory limits is whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion and not whether another sentence might be more appropriate. In the present case, the sentencing court detailed why the defendant's cooperation with federal authorities did not warrant imposition of a sentence in line with the relatively mild penalty imposed in the federal court. The proper question here is not whether another court might have weighed defendant's cooperation with federal authorities differently and imposed a lesser penalty. Rather, the focal question is whether the penalty imposed by the sentencing court is excessive because it is grossly disproportionate to the offense. Given the sheer magnitude of defendant's criminal organization, involving upwards of 30 people, and the large amount of cocaine, approximately 1,800 grams at the time of arrest, the defendant cannot show that the sentencing choice is grossly disproportionate to the offense.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. PHILLIPS, 2002-0737 (La. 11/15/02)
(Nov 15, 2002)