Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

RODERICK COURTNEY, Appellant, v. CITY OF WACO AND WACO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellees.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

After Roderick Courtney filed a notice of appeal, he notified this court that he had filed bankruptcy which operated to stay this cause. We were then notified that on June 15, 2001, the bankruptcy proceeding was dismissed.

We notified the parties by letter in January that the Rules of Appellate Procedure require a party seeking to reinstate an appeal stayed by bankruptcy proceedings to file a motion requesting reinstatement. See Tex.R.App.P. 8.3(a). No action was taken to reinstate the appeal.

In October, we notified the parties by letter that unless we received a motion to reinstate within 10 days of the date of the letter, the appeal would be reinstated on our own motion and dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.3(b). Ten days have passed, and no motion or other response has been received.

Therefore, we reinstate this appeal, and because no action has been taken in this cause since March of 2001, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

Dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COURTNEY v. CITY OF WACO
(Nov 27, 2002)