AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

SHEENA WOODS, ETC., ET AL., plaintiffs-appellants, v. MARTHA ELENA ALVAREZ, defendant third-party plaintiff-appellant; HECTOR SALANDY, ET AL., third-party defendants-respondents.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeals from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal by the defendant third-party plaintiff from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal by the defendant third-party plaintiff from the judgment (see CPLR 5501[a][1]; Woods v. Alvarez ( 300 A.D.2d 301 [Appellate Division Docket No. 2001-06198, decided herewith]). In any event, the plaintiffs' appeal must be dismissed because they are not aggrieved by the order (see CPLR 5511).

RITTER, J.P., ALTMAN, H. MILLER and COZIER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WOODS v. ALVAREZ
(Dec 2, 2002)