DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff alleged that she was injured after she tripped and stumbled over a "ridge" in a floor mat located in the front vestibule of the hospital where she worked. The defendant supplied the mat to the hospital pursuant to an oral agreement whereby the defendant would pick up dirty mats and replace them with clean mats on a weekly basis. The defendant did not have any responsibility for the maintenance or inspection of the hospital's premises. The plaintiff alleged that the ridge in the mat constituted a dangerous condition which was caused by the defendant's improper storage and placement of the mat.
While liability can be predicated upon a showing that the defendant created a dangerous condition upon the hospital's property (see Finley v. Weill, 264 A.D.2d 438; Phillips v. Seril, 209 A.D.2d 496), the defendant demonstrated its entitlement to summary judgment by establishing that the record contained no evidence that the alleged ridge existed before the plaintiff's accident, or that it caused the alleged ridge.
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to demonstrate the existence of a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557).
In light of the foregoing, we need not reach the issue of whether the alleged defect was trivial in nature.
RITTER, J.P., FRIEDMANN, H. MILLER and COZIER, JJ., concur.