DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with one bill of costs to the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs, the motions are granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.
It is undisputed that the plaintiff sustained a scar 7/8 of an inch in length on her lower lip. In opposition to the appellants' prime facie establishment of their entitlement to summary judgment, the plaintiff alleged that the scar constituted a "significant disfigurement" and, therefore, was a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d). However, contrary to the plaintiff's contentions, a reasonable person viewing the plaintiff's lower lip in its altered state would not regard the condition as unattractive, objectionable, or as the object of pity and scorn (see Loiseau v. Maxwell, 256 A.D.2d 450; Edwards v. DeHaven, 155 A.D.2d 757). Thus, the appellants' respective motions should have been granted.
ALTMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, McGINITY, SCHMIDT and RIVERA, JJ., concur.