RECK v. DIVISION OF TAXATION

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

A-93 September Term 2001

Attorney(S)

Charles M. Costenbader argued the cause for appellants (McCarter English, attorneys
Michael A. Guariglia
Margaret C. Wilson, on the briefs). Patrick DeAlmeida, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (David Samson, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney
Michael J. Haas, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

Judges

PER CURIAM

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

A-93 September Term 2001

Attorney(S)

Charles M. Costenbader argued the cause for appellants (McCarter English, attorneys
Michael A. Guariglia
Margaret C. Wilson, on the briefs). Patrick DeAlmeida, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (David Samson, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney
Michael J. Haas, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

Judges

PER CURIAM

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

JOHN RECK and BARBARA RECK, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DIRECTOR,DIVISION OF TAXATION, Defendant-Respondent.

PER CURIAM

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Stern's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 345 N.J. Super. 443 (2001).

CHIEF JUSTICE PORITZ and JUSTICES COLEMAN, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI and ALBIN join in this opinion. JUSTICES LONG and VERNIERO filed a separate dissenting opinion.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

JOHN RECK and BARBARA RECK, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DIRECTOR,DIVISION OF TAXATION, Defendant-Respondent.

Comments