AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. KING DAVIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the matter is remitted to Onondaga County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum:

At a hearing held pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) (Correction Law art 6-C), County Court erred in refusing to permit defendant to introduce evidence on the issue whether "the risk of repeat offense is high and there exists a threat to the public safety" (§ 168-l [6] [c]). In making its determination, the court "shall review * * * any relevant materials and evidence submitted by the sex offender" (§ 168-n [3]). We thus reverse the order and remit the matter to Onondaga County Court for a new hearing. Defendant's constitutional challenges to SORA made for the first time on appeal in the pro se supplemental brief are not preserved for our review ( see People v. Lyday, 241 A.D.2d 950).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. DAVIS
(Dec 30, 2002)