DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that certain comments made by the prosecutor constituted reversible error is unpreserved for appellate review. The defense counsel either failed to make specific and timely objections (see CPL 470.05; People v. Woods, 296 A.D.2d 430, lv denied 98 N.Y.2d 715; People v. Hilliard, 279 A.D.2d 590), or in those instances where the trial court sustained the defense counsel's objections, counsel made no further requests for curative jury instructions nor moved for a mistrial (see People v. Medina, 53 N.Y.2d 951; People v. Woods, supra; People v. Hernandez, 258 A.D.2d 666; People v. Stevens, 218 A.D.2d 678). In any event, the majority of the prosecutor's comments were within the bounds of permissible rhetorical comment (see e.g. People v. Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396), or were a fair response to the statements contained in the defense counsel's summation (see People v. Halm, 81 N.Y.2d 819; People v. Pope, 253 A.D.2d 443; People v. Davis, 223 A.D.2d 652; People v. Elliot, 216 A.D.2d 576).
RITTER, J.P., LUCIANO, COZIER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.