AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. GRANT TALLEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20). The challenge by defendant to the amount of restitution ordered by County Court is not foreclosed by his waiver of the right to appeal because the amount of restitution was not included in the terms of the plea agreement ( see People v. Wright, 288 A.D.2d 899, 900, lv denied 97 N.Y.2d 689). We conclude, however, that defendant's challenge lacks merit. The court did not abuse its discretion in ordering defendant following a hearing to pay restitution of less than half of the total purchase price of six unrecovered laptop computers, most of which were only two years old ( see § 60.27 [1], [2]; see also People v. Fuller, 57 N.Y.2d 152, 157-158).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. TALLEY
(Dec 30, 2002)