Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MICHAEL HERBERT, Plaintiff, v. USTON CORNELIUS, Defendant

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

JEFFREY RESNICK, Magistrate Judge

THIS MATTER came for consideration on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Virgin Islands Police Department (VIPD) Commissioner Franz Christian to produce documents requested to pursuant to subpoena (Exhibit "A" to the motion). The documents relate to the VIPD Internal Affairs investigation of the subject September 29, 2001 incident. Neither Defendant nor the VIPD filed opposition to the motion.

On October 28, 2002 default was entered against Defendant. On December 5, 2002, AAG Michael McLaurin entered a Notice of Appearance on behalf of Defendant and Government of the Virgin Islands. The Court has scheduled a conference on January 28, 2003 to schedule a hearing on damages. The documents requested may have relevance to Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages.

Plaintiff's Complaint is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and alleges that on September 29, 2001, Defendant wrongfully shot Plaintiff. Plaintiff alleges that at all relevant time Defendant was acting within the course and scope of his employment as an office with VIPD.

Internal Affairs investigation files in such cases are generally discoverable. Mercy et al. v. County of Suffolk et al., 93 F.R.D. 520, 523 (E.D.N.Y. 1982). LRCr 16.1 provides a procedure for a Defendant to obtain such records in a criminal case. There is no similar provision in the civil rules however the Court will borrow form such criminal rule in determining what is appropriate herein. The Courts have recognized a balancing test in determining whether particularly sensitive matters should be disclosed. See Kelly v. City of San Jose et al., 114 F.R.D. 653, 663 (N.D. Cal. 1987) [citing Frankenhauser v. Rizzo, 59 F.R.D. 339 (E.D.Pa. 1973)].

Upon consideration, it is hereby;

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Virgin Islands Department of Justice shall promptly obtain and review the subject VIPD Internal investigation file and the personnel file of Defendant, Uston Cornelius and shall produce all documents requested by Plaintiff's subpoena, that are not specifically objected to, by January 24, 2003.
2. To the extent the Virgin Islands Department of Justice asserts that any portions of such information should not be disclosed, such documents together with a brief statement of the particular reasons for such non-disclosure shall be delivered to my chambers by January 24, 2003 for in camera review.
3. Plaintiff shall maintain confidentiality of all documents produced except as is reasonably necessary for prosecution of this matter.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HERBERT v. USTON CORNELIUS
(Jan 8, 2003)