Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

IN RE: NATHALIE ROYOT, VERONIQUE MARTY, CELINE MOGUEN, AND GUILLAUME JARRY.

Not considered. As to petitioners Nathalie Royot, Veronique Marty, and Celine Moguen, there has been no showing that their qualifications for admission have changed since this Court denied their prior applications. In the absence of such showing, this Court will not consider a new application from these petitioners. As to petitioner Guillaume Jarry, the application is premature, as there is no indication petitioner has applied for admission to the Committee on Bar Admissions. See Supreme Court Rule XVII.

JLW

PFC

CDK

BJJ

JPV

CDT

JTK

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE ROYOT, 2002-2623 (La. 1/10/03)
(Jan 10, 2003)