Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HAY v. BRIGHT.

SEARS, Presiding Justice.

Appellant Samuel Hay, III, a private citizen, filed a petition for mandamus relief that would compel appellee Frederick Bright, the District Attorney of the Ocmulgee Judicial Circuit, to prosecute Tommy Craig for alleged perjury committed during a bond validation hearing. The superior court denied appellant's mandamus petition, and he appeals.

This Court has repeatedly held that:

`A citizen does not have a judicially cognizable interest in the prosecution or nonprosecution of another, and hence, lacks standing to contest the prosecuting authority's policies when the citizen is neither prosecuted nor threatened with prosecution.'

It follows that appellant lacked standing to seek mandamus relief that would compel appellee to prosecute Craig. Therefore, the trial court properly denied appellant's petition.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

SEARS, Presiding Justice.

DENIED JANUARY 13, 2003 — RECONSIDERATION DENIED FEBRUARY 7, 2003.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HAY v. BRIGHT
(Jan 13, 2003)