DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court providently exercised its discretion in denying his request to proceed pro se. The request was untimely and made at an advanced stage of the trial, and the defendant failed to set forth a compelling reason for the request (see People v. McIntyre, 36 N.Y.2d 10; People v. Bell, 234 A.D.2d 378; People v. Walker, 168 A.D.2d 525, 526).
Moreover, the trial court properly declined to charge petit larceny and assault in the second degree as lesser-included offenses. Viewed in the light most favorable to the defendant, we find that under the facts of this case there is no reasonable view of the evidence which would have supported the submission of these charges (see CPL 300.50; People v. Scarborough, 49 N.Y.2d 364, 368; People v. Ruggiero, 282 A.D.2d 765; People v. Zayas, 140 A.D.2d 395).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are without merit.
S. MILLER, J.P., SCHMIDT, TOWNES and CRANE, JJ., concur.