Zoning — subdivision plat — compliance with ordinance and regulations — entitlement to approval
The decision of the Court of Appeals in this case is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion that a subdivision plat for affordable housing complied with a city's zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations, the city council's denial of the subdivision application was unsupported by competent, material and substantial evidence, and the applicant was entitled to approval of its subdivision plat.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.
REVERSED.