Zoning — residential area — sawmill — accessory use
The decision of the Court of Appeals in the case is reversed for the reason stated in the dissenting opinion that landowners' use of a sawmill on residentially zoned property for nonindustrial and nonmanufacturing purposes did not violate a city zoning ordinance but was a permitted accessory use.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Superior Court, New Hanover County, for proceedings not inconsistent with the dissenting opinion.
REVERSED AND REMANDED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.