Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

JOYCE LYNN ROGERS, Plaintiff Below, v. LEAR CORPORATION AND INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT BOARD, Defendants Below, Appellees.

Appeal Dismissed.

Unpublished opinion is below.

JOYCE LYNN ROGERS, Plaintiff Below, v. LEAR CORPORATION AND INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT BOARD, Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 310, 2002 Supreme Court of Delaware. February 3, 2003

WALSH, Joseph T. Justice

ORDER

This 3rd day of February 2003, it appears to the Court that on November 19, 2002, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant's failure to diligently prosecute her appeal by not filing her opening brief and appendix in this matter. The appellant responded by letter dated December 10, 2002, and requested an extension of time to file her brief. By letter dated January 2, 2003, the appellant was granted an extension of time until January 17, 2003. In the January 2 letter, the appellant was advised that if her opening brief was not filed by January 17, the Court would deem the dismissal of this appeal as unopposed. The appellant has failed to file her opening brief; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROGERS v. LEAR CORP. AND IND. ACCIDENT BRD
(Feb 3, 2003)