AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

JOAN GRIFFIN, Plaintiff, v. AUTOZONE, INC., Defendant

ORDER

GORDON J. QUIST, District Judge.

In accordance with the Opinion filed on this date,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 25) on Plaintiff's retaliatory discharge claims under the Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act, MCL § 37.2101— 37.2804, and the Whistleblower Protection Act, MCL § 15.362— 15.369, is GRANTED, on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to make the required prima facie showing that there was a causal connection between Plaintiff's protected activity and Defendant's adverse employment action.

This case is closed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GRIFFIN v. AUTOZONE, INC., (W.D.Mich. 2003)
(Feb 7, 2003)