AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PATRICIA PATTERSON, respondent, v. ROBERT A. PATTERSON III, appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for a hearing on the issue of an award of an attorney's fee, if any, to the plaintiff.

The Supreme Court erred in awarding the plaintiff an attorney's fee in the sum of $23,157.28 without first conducting an evidentiary hearing. Under the circumstances of this case, a hearing was necessary both to explore the relative financial circumstances of the parties (see Kiprilova v. Kiprilov, 255 A.D.2d 362), and to afford the defendant a "meaningful way of testing the [attorney's] claims relative to time and value" (Price v. Price, 113 A.D.2d 299, affd 69 N.Y.2d 8; see also Green v. Green, 288 A.D.2d 436; Nee v. Nee, 240 A.D.2d 478; Popack v. Popack, 179 A.D.2d 746).

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, McGINITY and MASTRO, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PATTERSON v. PATTERSON
(Feb 18, 2003)