AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY S. (ANONYMOUS).

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order of disposition dated April 24, 2002, is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the admission is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

Family Court Act § 321.3(1) requires that, before granting its consent to entry of an admission, the Family Court ascertain through allocution of the juvenile and, in this case, the juvenile's mother, that the juvenile committed the act to which he or she is entering an admission, that he or she is voluntarily waiving his or her right to a fact-finding hearing, and that he or she is aware of all possible specific dispositional orders that it may issue, and further provides that these requirements are not waivable. Reversal is required on the basis that the court failed to ascertain whether the juvenile, in making his admission, was aware of the "possible specific dispositional orders" (see Family Ct Act § 321.3[c]; Matter of LeJuane S., 247 A.D.2d 481, 482). Moreover, the court failed to obtain an allocution of the juvenile's mother as to her understanding of the consequences of the juvenile's admission (see Matter of Perry O., 232 A.D.2d 225; Matter of Shantique F., 223 A.D.2d 590, 591; Matter of Melvin A., 216 A.D.2d 227, 228).

In light of the foregoing, we do not reach any other issue.

ALTMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, FRIEDMANN and McGINITY, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY S
(Feb 18, 2003)