AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

RICHARD H. WILLETT, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. LINCOLNSHIRE MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL., Defendants-Appellants.

The IAS court properly granted plaintiff summary judgment on his conversion claim against defendant Lincolnshire Management, Inc. (LMI). It is undisputed that LMI, in its role of managing agent of defendant Lincolnshire Equity Fund, L.P. (The Fund), withheld substantial distributions owed to plaintiff by The Fund. LMI's affirmative defense, that it properly withheld the distributions due plaintiff to offset a substantial obligation owed from plaintiff to LMI, was properly dismissed. The obligation purportedly owing from plaintiff to LMI is currently being disputed and "there is no right to set off a possible, unliquidated liability against a liquidated claim that is due and payable" (Spodek v. Park Prop. Dev. Assocs., 263 A.D.2d 478, 478-479; see also New Haven Props. Ltd. v. Grinberg, 293 A.D.2d 386). The IAS court also properly dismissed the affirmative defenses that LMI's actions were justified in the interests of equity and that plaintiff's conversion claim was barred by the doctrines of estoppel and unclean hands since there was no evidence of wrongdoing by plaintiff.

We have considered defendants' remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WILLETT v. LINCOLNSHIRE MGMT
(Feb 20, 2003)