DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the appeals from the jury verdicts are dismissed, as no appeal lies from a jury verdict (see People v. Pugh, 258 A.D.2d 674); and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the facts and as an exercise of discretion, with costs, that branch of the motion which was to set aside the jury verdict on the issue of damages is granted, the order is modified accordingly, and a new trial is granted on the issue of damages only, unless within 30 days after service upon the plaintiff Irma Milne of a copy of this decision and order, she shall serve and file in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County, a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict as to damages for past pain and suffering from the sum of $125,000 to $75,000, and future pain and suffering from the sum of $275,000 to $175,000, and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly; in the event that the plaintiff Irma Milne so stipulates, then the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The appeal from the order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501[a][1]).
The jury verdict on the issue of liability was both rational (see Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, 45 N.Y.2d 493, 499), and based on a fair interpretation of the evidence (see Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129).
However, the award of damages for past and future pain and suffering is excessive to the extent indicated (see CPLR 5501[c]; cf. Almada v. Long Is. Light. Co., 246 A.D.2d 563; Julien v. Physician's Hosp., 231 A.D.2d 678; Blyskal v. Kelleher, 171 A.D.2d 718).
The defendant's remaining arguments are without merit.
ALTMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, FRIEDMANN and McGINITY, JJ., concur.