AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

INTEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. BROADCOM CORPORATION, Defendant.

ORDER

SUE L. ROBINSON, United States District Judge

At Wilmington, this 3rd day of March, 2003;

IT IS ORDERED that defendant's motion for reconsideration or certification (D.I. 817) is denied for the following reasons:

1. The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to "correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence." Max's Seafood Café ex-rel. Lou-Ann, Inc. v. Quinteros, 176 F.3d 669, 677 (3d Cir. 1999). Accordingly, a court may alter or amend its judgment if the movant demonstrates at least one of the following: (1) a change in the controlling law; (2) availability of new evidence not available when summary judgment was granted; or (3) a need to correct a clear error of law or fact or to prevent manifest injustice. See id.
2. Defendant has failed to demonstrate any of the aforementioned grounds to warrant a reconsideration of the court's February 13, 2003 order.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

INTEL CORPORATION v. BROADCOM CORPORATION
(Mar 3, 2003)