AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

ANIMAL CARE FOUNDATION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. HAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY, INC., and PAMELA BURNS, Defendants-Appellees and JOHN AND MARY DOES 1-10 and DOE CORPORATIONS, PARTNERSHIPS OR OTHER ENTITIES 1-10, Defendants

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration of the February 12, 2003 order dismissing appeal, the papers in support and the record, it appears that HRAP 26(c) does not apply to the provisions of HRAP 4(a)(1) and the mailing of the notice of appeal to the district court did not affect the thirty-day period for filing the notice of appeal. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ANIMAL CARE FOUNDATION v. HUMANE SOCIETY, 25482 (Haw. 3-3-2003)
(Mar 3, 2003)