AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF TRANSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY. ESTIMINET, INC., appellant; NEW YORK STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF INSURANCE, AS LIQUIDATOR OF TRANSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, respondent.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that an insurance carrier can be relieved of its duty to defend if it establishes, as a matter of law, that there is no possible factual or legal basis on which it might eventually be obligated to indemnify its insured under any policy provision (see Spoor-Lasher Co. v. Aetna Cas. Sur. Co., 39 N.Y.2d 875, 876; Allstate Ins. Co. v. Bostic, 228 A.D.2d 628). The claimant, Estiminet, Inc. (hereinafter Estiminet), the owner of a restaurant/bar doing business under the name "Heffrons," sought a defense and indemnification from the New York State Superintendent of Insurance, as Liquidator of Transtate Insurance Company (hereinafter the Insurer), under its commercial general liability policy in an action commenced against it by Christopher Lehanka. Since the underlying action arose from an assault and battery, the Supreme Court properly confirmed the referee's report, affirming the Insurer's denial of the claim based upon a policy endorsement excluding claims arising from assault and battery (see Mount Vernon Fire Ins. Co. v. Creative Hous., 88 N.Y.2d 347, 350).

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.

SANTUCCI, J.P., FRIEDMANN, LUCIANO and RIVERA, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF TRANSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
(Mar 10, 2003)