Defendant's motion to suppress was properly denied. Defendant's argument that the radio transmissions from the undercover and "ghost" officers, relating that a "positive buy" involving two described individuals had transpired, were insufficient to establish probable cause to arrest defendant because they contained no information about his role in the drug transaction, is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would adhere to our prior decisions that have repeatedly rejected this argument (see e.g. People v. Muniz, 276 A.D.2d 346, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 762; People v. Shorter, 275 A.D.2d 253, lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 761; People v. Acevedo, 179 A.D.2d 465, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 996).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.