AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KARL SPITZLEY, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

After pleading guilty to the crime of driving while intoxicated, defendant was sentenced to five years' probation. Defendant was subsequently arrested and, following a hearing, was found to have violated the terms of his probation by, inter alia, being under the influence of alcohol and in possession of a loaded weapon. County Court revoked his probation and sentenced him to a prison term of 1 to 4 years. On appeal, defendant's sole contention is that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive in view of his poor health. Given defendant's lengthy criminal record and the serious nature of defendant's conduct leading to the violation of probation, we find no extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v. Berry, 288 A.D.2d 501). We also reject defendant's assertion that the sentence was premised upon incorrect information based upon County Court's misstatement regarding who offered testimony against him at the hearing, as the court was referring to statements provided to the police at the time of his arrest regarding the serious nature of defendant's threats.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SPITZLEY
(Mar 13, 2003)