AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOYCE DUNEFSKY, ET AL., plaintiffs-respondents, v. PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES INC., defendant-respondent, JORICH PROPERTIES COMPANY, appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the action is dismissed.

The Supreme Court erred in denying the appellant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3012(b) to dismiss the action. The plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the delay, and the affidavit of merit did not establish a meritorious cause of action (see CPLR 3012[d]; Snyder v. Blinder, 230 A.D.2d 728; Gibson v. Victory Mem. Hosp., 221 A.D.2d 503).

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, H. MILLER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DUNEFSKY v. PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES INC
(Mar 24, 2003)