AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff-respondent v. PABLO GOICO, Defendant-appellant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02 [former (4)]) and sentencing him to a determinate term of incarceration of seven years followed by a three-year period of postrelease supervision. We reject defendant's contention that County Court was obligated to conduct a Rodriguez hearing (see People v. Rodriguez, 79 N.Y.2d 445, 451-453) in addition to the Wade hearing conducted by the court. We reject defendant's further contention that the photo array procedure was unduly suggestive (see People v. Merriweather, 298 A.D.2d 950, lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 561; People v. Bell, 265 A.D.2d 813, lv denied 94 N.Y.2d 916). Finally, we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. GOICO
(Mar 21, 2003)