AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF RAMONA BANKS, respondent, v. NATIONAL UNION INSURANCE CO., appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Proceedings pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 29(5) are directed to the discretion of the court (see Hargrove v. Becom Real, 287 A.D.2d 598; Matter of Gilson v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., 246 A.D.2d 897; Severino v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 238 A.D.2d 837, 838). The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in approving the petitioner's settlement with a third party nunc pro tunc (see DeRosa v. Petrylak, 290 A.D.2d 596).

ALTMAN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, LUCIANO and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE BANKS v. NATIONAL UNION INS
(Apr 7, 2003)