DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Before making a parole release decision, the Executive Law requires a parole board to consider, among other things, the inmate's institutional record, performance in a temporary release program, and release plans (see Executive Law § 259-i [c] [A]). Additionally, where a court determines the minimum sentence of imprisonment, as was done here, the parole board is also required to consider, among other factors, the "recommendations of the sentencing court" (Executive Law § 259-i [a] [i], [2] [c] [A]).
Here, the New York State Division of Parole (hereinafter the Division) conceded that it did not consider the sentencing minutes before it rendered its decision. The minutes reveal that the sentencing judge did not intend the petitioner to serve more than the minimum term of imprisonment. Since the minutes contain what is, essentially, a recommendation of the sentencing court, the Division's admitted failure to consider the minutes justified judicial intervention. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly annulled the determination and remitted the matter to the Division for a de novo hearing.
ALTMAN, J.P., LUCIANO, H. MILLER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.