Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

HARRY E. WEAKLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellant, v. TOLEDO ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., USF G/T. PAUL INSURANCE COMPANY, and SECOND INJURY FUND, Defendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants.

COA: 232473, WCAC: 00-0000150

In this cause, a motion for rehearing is considered and, in lieu of granting rehearing, we amend the final sentence of the opinion of February 4, 2003 to read as follows:

"Defendant's application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant to contest the WCAC decision to reimburse plaintiff for the cost of the van conversion is denied for the reason that the Court is no longer persuaded the question should be reviewed by the Court."

In all other respects, the motion for rehearing and plaintiff-appellee's request for clarification are DENIED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WEAKLAND v. TOLEDO ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC
(Apr 8, 2003)