AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ESTEBAN MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Defendant's claims pursuant to Batson v. Kentucky ( 476 U.S. 79) are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice (see People v. James, 99 N.Y.2d 264). The record establishes that defendant abandoned his request that the People provide race-neutral explanations for the particular peremptory challenges at issue on appeal.

Defendant's arrest photograph was admitted for relevant purposes (see People v. Larry, 178 A.D.2d 282, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 1003). Defendant's remaining contentions concerning this photograph are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. MARTINEZ
(Apr 10, 2003)