AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

IN THE MATTER OF DARETH O. (ANONYMOUS). ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, respondent; DALE E. (ANONYMOUS), appellant. (PROCEEDING NO. 1) IN THE MATTER OF DANTE E. (ANONYMOUS). ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, respondent; DALE E. (ANONYMOUS), appellant. (PROCEEDING NO. 2)

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeals from the order of protection and those portions of the orders of disposition which placed the children in the custody of the Administration for Children's Services for one year are dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

ORDERED that the orders of disposition are affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeals from the order of protection and those portions of the orders of disposition which placed the children in the custody of the Administration for Children's Services must be dismissed as academic because those orders expired by their own terms on November 29, 2001 (see Matter of H. Children, 276 A.D.2d 485; Matter of Arthur C., 260 A.D.2d 478). Nevertheless, the adjudications of neglect constitute a permanent and significant stigma which might indirectly affect the appellant's status in any future proceedings. Therefore, the appeals from so much of the orders of disposition as determined that she neglected her children are not academic (see Matter of H. Children, supra; Matter of Arthur C., supra).

Contrary to the appellant mother's contention, the Family Court's finding of excessive corporal punishment is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Court Act § 1046[b]; Matter of Nicole V., 71 N.Y.2d 112, 117). The out-of-court statements of one of the children were sufficiently corroborated by the testimony of an examining physician, hospital records, and photographs showing scars and bruises, which were consistent with allegations of excessive corporal punishment inflicted by the appellant. Unrebutted evidence of excessive school absences was sufficient to establish the appellant's educational neglect (see Matter of Fatima A., 276 A.D.2d 791; Matter of Heith S., 189 A.D.2d 875).

The finding of derivative neglect as to the other child is supported by evidence indicating the appellant's lack of understanding of her parental responsibility (see Matter of Duchess County Dept. of Social Servs., 242 A.D.2d 533; Matter of Christina Maria C., 89 A.D.2d 855).

FLORIO, J.P., LUCIANO, SCHMIDT and COZIER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF DARETH O
(Apr 14, 2003)