AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

CARY OIL CO., INC., et al., Plaintiffs, against MG REFINING MARKETING, INC., et al., Defendants.

DECISION AND ORDER

VICTOR MARRERO, United States District Judge.

Before the Court are seven motions in limine (the "Motions") submitted by Plaintiffs and Defendants in connection with the trial of this matter, scheduled to begin on May 5, 2003.

As discussed in the Statement of the Court Regarding Certain Motions in Limine of Plaintiffs and Defendants, dated April 24, 2003, which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, the Court denies six of the Motions and grants one Motion. Accordingly, it is hereby

The court notes that the Statement which was provided to the parties at the pre-trial conference held on April 23, 2003 did not contain the court's response to (1) Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude Evidence, Argument and Expert Opinion on Whether Plaintiffs Would Have Behaved Optimally Had the contracts Not Been Breached and (2) Defendants' Motion to Exclude The Proposed Expert Testimony of Alexander Triantis, both of which are contained in the Statement attached hereto.

ORDERED that the Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Production of Defendants' Records with Respect to Payment of Expert Witnesses is denied; and it is further

ORDERED that the Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude Consent Order, Reference to its Terms and Content, and Evidence of CFTC Negotiating Positions is denied; and it is further

ORDERED that the Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude References to Religious Affiliation of MGAG's Founders is denied; and it is further

ORDERED that the Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude Evidence and Argument on Mitigation of Damages is denied; and it is further

ORDERED that the Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude Evidence and Argument on Waiver, Agreement to Rescind and Equitable Estoppel is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude Evidence, Argument and Expert Opinion on Whether Plaintiffs Would Have Behaved Optimally Had the Contracts Not Been Breached is denied; and it is finally

ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion to Exclude The Proposed Expert Testimony of Alexander Triantis is denied.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CARY OIL CO., INC. v. MG REFINING MARKETING, INC., (S.D.N.Y. 2003)
(Apr 24, 2003)