AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STEVEN VERILLE, ET AL., respondents, v. DRAGO KOPIC, appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for a hearing on the issue of whether proper service was effected.

Ordinarily a proper affidavit of a process server attesting to personal delivery of a summons to a party is sufficient to support a finding of jurisdiction. Where, as here, however, there is a sworn denial of service by the party allegedly served, the affidavit of service is rebutted and jurisdiction must be established by a preponderance of the evidence at a hearing (see Griffin v. Griffin, 215 A.D.2d 386; Skyline Agency v. Coppotelli, Inc., 117 A.D.2d 135). Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in denying the motion to vacate the defendant's default without conducting a hearing on the issue of whether proper service was effected (see Griffin v. Griffin, supra).

SANTUCCI, J.P., SMITH, LUCIANO, SCHMIDT and MASTRO, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

VERILLE v. KOPIC
(Apr 28, 2003)