AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

MOHICAN VALLEY TOWING, Plaintiff v. OHIO STATE HIGHWAY PATROL, Defendant.

MEMORANDUM DECISION

{¶ 1} THE COURT FINDS THAT:

{¶ 2} 1) On November 29, 2002, plaintiff, Mohican Valley Towing, filed a complaint against defendant, Ohio State Highway Patrol alleging defendant was responsible for towing and impound fees assessed. Plaintiff seeks damages in the amount of $1,460.94. Plaintiff submitted the filing fee with the complaint;

{¶ 3} 2) On January 30, 2003, defendant filed an investigation report admitting liability and acknowledging plaintiff suffered damages in the amount of $1,460.94.

{¶ 4} THE COURT CONCLUDES THAT:

{¶ 5} 1) I find, by a preponderance of the evidence, liability by defendant has been shown. Baisden v. Southern Ohio Correctional Facility (1979), 76-0617-AD; Stewart v. Ohio National Guard (1979), 78-0342-AD;

{¶ 6} 2) Plaintiff has suffered damages in the amount of $1,460.94, plus the $25.00 filing fee, which may be reimbursed as compensable damages pursuant to the holding in Bailey v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (1990), 62 Ohio Misc.2d 19.

{¶ 7} Having considered all the evidence in the claim file and adopting the memorandum decision concurrently herewith;

{¶ 8} IT IS ORDERED THAT:

{¶ 9} 1) Plaintiff's claim is GRANTED and judgment is rendered in favor of the plaintiff;

{¶ 10} 2) Defendant (Ohio State Highway Patrol) pay plaintiff (Mohican Valley Towing) $1,485.94 and such interest as is allowed by law;

{¶ 11} 3) The court costs are assessed against defendant.

DANIEL R. BORCHERT Deputy Clerk

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MOHICAN VALLEY TOWING v. STATE HWY. PAT., Unpublished Decision (5-1-2003)
(May 1, 2003)