JOHN HANNAH, Chief Judge, District
For reasons expressed in the accompanying memorandum order adopting the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that plaintiff's action against defendant is DISMISSED. It is further
ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. It is further
ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that each party is assessed his or her respective costs.
MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The court heretofore ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Earl S. Hines, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate judge recommends that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed and the case dismissed.
The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. Plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation.
The court has conducted a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b). After careful consideration, the court concludes the objections are without merit.
ORDER
Accordingly, plaintiffs objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge's recommendation.