AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. DANIEL CARDELL, appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

On the facts presented, the imposition of consecutive terms of imprisonment was legal (see Penal Law § 70.25; People v. Laureano, 87 N.Y.2d 640).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

RITTER, J.P., SMITH, GOLDSTEIN and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. CARDELL
(May 12, 2003)