AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MARY TROWELL, appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION, ET AL., respondents.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not err in, inter alia, denying the plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the complaint to allege a cause of action sounding in negligence, as no such claim was set forth in the plaintiff's notice of claim (see Linden v. President and Directors of Chase Manhattan Bank, 299 A.D.2d 216, lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 509 [Mar. 27, 2003]; Mazzilli v. City of New York, 154 A.D.2d 355).

FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, ADAMS and RIVERA, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TROWELL v. N.Y.C. HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORP
(May 19, 2003)